Reliability of Assessing Hand Osteoarthritis on Digital Photographs and Associations With Radiographic and Clinical Findings.

Marshall, Michelle; Jonsson, Helgi; Helgadottir, Gudrun P.; Nicholls, Elaine; Van Der Windt, Danielle; Myers, Helen; Dziedzic, Krysia

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability and construct validity of an atlas for grading hand osteoarthritis (OA) on photographs in a separate younger community-dwelling population than the development cohort. METHODS: Participants were community-dwelling adults (ages =50 years) in North Staffordshire, UK with hand pain or hand problems in the last year who attended a research clinic. High-quality photographs were taken in a standardized position. A photographic atlas was used to score hand joints (second and third distal interphalangeal [DIP], second and third proximal interphalangeal [PIP], and first carpometacarpal [CMC] joints) and joint groups (DIP, PIP, and CMC joints) for OA on a 0-3 scale. Hand radiographs were graded for OA using the Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading system. Clinical features (nodes, bony enlargement, and deformity) were determined by physical examination. Associations of photographic hand OA grades with radiographic OA and clinical features were determined to assess construct validity. RESULTS: In total, 558 participants (mean age 64 years, 62% women) were included in the analyses. Reliability for scoring OA on the photographs was good (mean intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.77 and mean interrater ICC 0.71). At the joint level, photographic hand OA grade was positively associated with radiographic OA grade (Spearman's ? = 0.19-0.57, P < 0.001) and the number of clinical features (Spearman's ? = 0.36-0.59, P < 0.001). At the person level, individuals with higher global photographic OA scores had higher summed K/L scores and higher percentages meeting the American College of Rheumatology clinical hand OA criteria. CONCLUSION: This photographic scoring system was reliable and a good indicator of hand OA in a separate younger community-dwelling population than the development cohort. This method of data collection offers researchers a feasible alternative to physical examination and radiography.

Citation

Marshall, M., Jonsson, H., Helgadottir, G. P., Nicholls, E., Van Der Windt, D., Myers, H., & Dziedzic, K. (2014). Reliability of Assessing Hand Osteoarthritis on Digital Photographs and Associations With Radiographic and Clinical Findings. Arthritis Care & Research, 66(6), 828 - 836. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22225

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Oct 22, 2013
• Online Publication Date: Oct 31, 2013
• Publication Date: Jun 1, 2014
• Publicly Available Date: Jun 29, 2023
• Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)
• Print ISSN: 2151-464X
• Publisher: Wiley
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 66
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 828 - 836
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22225
• Keywords: Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, England, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hand Joints, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Osteoarthritis, Photography, Physical Examination, Predictive Value of Tests, Prevalence, Prospective Studies, Radiogra
• Publisher URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/acr.22225