James Grange j.a.grange@keele.ac.uk
Improving research quality: The view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement
Grange
Authors
Abstract
The adoption and incentivisation of open and transparent research practices is critical in addressing issues around research reproducibility and research integrity. These practices will require training and funding. Individuals need to be incentivised to adopt open and transparent research practices (e.g., added as desirable criteria in hiring, probation, and promotion decisions, recognition that funded research should be conducted openly and transparently, the importance of publishers mandating the publication of research workflows and appropriately curated data associated with each research output). Similarly, institutions need to be incentivised to encourage the adoption of open and transparent practices by researchers. Research quality should be prioritised over research quantity. As research transparency will look different for different disciplines, there can be no one-size-fits-all approach. An outward looking and joined up UK research strategy is needed that places openness and transparency at the heart of research activity. This should involve key stakeholders (institutions, research organisations, funders, publishers, and Government) and crucially should be focused on action. Failure to do this will have negative consequences not just for UK research, but also for our ability to innovate and subsequently commercialise UK-led discovery.
Citation
Grange. (2021). Improving research quality: The view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement. BMC Research Notes, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05883-3
Acceptance Date | Dec 9, 2021 |
---|---|
Publication Date | Dec 20, 2021 |
Journal | BMC Research Notes |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05883-3 |
Keywords | Research transparency; Research reproducibility; Research openness; FAIR data |
Publisher URL | https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-021-05883-3 |
Files
s13104-021-05883-3.pdf
(602 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
final.pdf
(63 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
UKRN Open Research Training Resources and Priorities Working Paper
(2023)
Working Paper
Rumination and inhibition in task switching: No evidence for an association
(2023)
Journal Article
Improving psychological science: further thoughts, reflections and ways forward
(2022)
Journal Article
A spurious correlation between difference scores in evidence-accumulation model parameters
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search