Zoe Paskins z.paskins@keele.ac.uk
Clinical effectiveness of one ultrasound guided intra-articular corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection in addition to advice and education for hip osteoarthritis (HIT trial): single blind, parallel group, three arm, randomised controlled trial
Paskins, Zoe; Bromley, Kieran; Lewis, Martyn; Hughes, Gemma; Hughes, Emily; Hennings, Susie; Cherrington, Andrea; Hall, Alison; Holden, Melanie A.; Stevenson, Kay; Menon, Ajit; Roberts, Philip; Peat, George; Jinks, Clare; Kigozi, Jesse; Oppong, Raymond; Foster, Nadine E.; Roddy, Edward; Mallen, Christian D.
Authors
Kieran Bromley k.bromley1@keele.ac.uk
Alyn Lewis a.m.lewis@keele.ac.uk
Gemma Hughes
Emily Hughes
Susie Hennings
Andrea Cherrington
Alison Hall
Melanie Holden m.holden@keele.ac.uk
Kay Stevenson
Ajit Menon
Philip Roberts
George Peat
Clare Jinks c.jinks@keele.ac.uk
Jesse Kigozi
Raymond Oppong
Nadine E. Foster
Edward Roddy e.roddy@keele.ac.uk
Christian Mallen c.d.mallen@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
Objectives: to compare the clinical effectiveness of best current treatment (BCT) plus single ultrasound-guided intra-articular hip injection (USGI) of 40mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4ml 1% lidocaine hydrochloride [BCT+US-Triamcinolone-Lidocaine] with BCT alone [BCT] and, secondarily, compare clinical effectiveness of BCT+US-Triamcinolone-Lidocaine, with BCT combined with an USGI of 5ml 1% lidocaine [BCT+US-Lidocaine]. Design: Pragmatic, three-arm parallel-group, single-blind randomised controlled trial. Setting: 2 community musculoskeletal services in England Participants: Adults aged =40 years with hip OA and at least moderate pain were eligible. 199 participants (43% male, mean age 63 years), were randomly assigned - 67 to arm (1) and 66 each to arms (2) and (3). Average weighted follow-up rate across time-points was 93%. Interventions: (1) BCT, (2) BCT+US-Triamcinolone-Lidocaine, or (3) BCT+US-Lidocaine. In the USGI arms, participants were not told which injection they received (to ensure masking). Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was self-reported current hip pain intensity (0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)) over 6 months. Secondary outcomes included pain and physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, WOMAC), pain self-efficacy, participant’s global impression of change and general health (EQ-5D-5L). Results: Greater mean improvement in hip pain intensity over 6 months was seen with BCT+US-Triamcinolone-Lidocaine compared with BCT: mean difference -1.43 (95%CI -2.15, -0.72). Participants treated with BCT+US-Triamcinolone-Lidocaine compared with BCT had greater mean improvement in function (WOMAC-F -5.47; -9.41, -1.53) and pain self-efficacy (5.87; 2.30, 9.45) over 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in hip pain intensity over 6 months between BCT+US-Triamcinolone-Lidocaine compared with BCT+US-Lidocaine (-0.52; -1.21, 0.18). However, a statistically significant difference was seen in favour of BCT+US-Triamcinolone-Lidocaine in comparison with BCT+US-Lidocaine for a range of secondary outcome measures, over 6 months (e.g. pain self-efficacy, function, and work presenteeism). The presence of synovitis or effusion on ultrasound predicted response to BCT+US-Triamcinolone-Lidocaine (-1.7; -3.1, -0.3). One participant in the BCT+US-Triamcinolone-Lidocaine arm with a bio-prosthetic aortic valve died 4 months after the intervention from subacute bacterial endocarditis, deemed possibly related to the trial treatment. Conclusions: USGI of triamcinolone acetonide is an additional treatment option to add to best current care for people with hip OA. As in routine clinical practice, caution should be applied in patients with risk factors for, or signs of infection.
Citation
Paskins, Z., Bromley, K., Lewis, M., Hughes, G., Hughes, E., Hennings, S., …Mallen, C. D. (2022). Clinical effectiveness of one ultrasound guided intra-articular corticosteroid and local anaesthetic injection in addition to advice and education for hip osteoarthritis (HIT trial): single blind, parallel group, three arm, randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 377, Article ARTN e068446. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068446
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 23, 2022 |
Publication Date | Apr 6, 2022 |
Publicly Available Date | May 30, 2023 |
Journal | BMJ: British Medical Journal |
Print ISSN | 0959-8138 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 377 |
Article Number | ARTN e068446 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068446 |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/422539 |
Publisher URL | https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-068446 |
PMID | 35387783 |
Files
bmj-2021-068446.full.pdf
(769 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
HIT Tables and Figures v3.1 12.1.22 clean.docx
(184 Kb)
Document
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
HIT Clinical effectiveness BMJ v1.3 11.1.22 CLEAN ACCEPTED VERSION.docx
(73 Kb)
Document
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search