Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Assessing the Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates for the Prevention of Fragility Fractures: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analyses

Bastounis, Anastasios; Langley, Tessa; Davis, Sarah; Paskins, Zoe; Gittoes, Neil; Leonardi‐Bee, Jo; Sahota, Opinder

Assessing the Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates for the Prevention of Fragility Fractures: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analyses Thumbnail


Authors

Anastasios Bastounis

Tessa Langley

Sarah Davis

Neil Gittoes

Jo Leonardi‐Bee

Opinder Sahota



Abstract

Bisphosphonates have been found to be effective in preventing fragility fractures. However, their comparative effectiveness in populations at risk has yet to be defined. In light of recent clinical trials, we aimed to compare four bisphosphonates (alendronate, ibandronate, risedronate, and zoledronate) and to identify which are the most effective for the prevention of fragility fractures. This is an update of a systematic review previously published as part of a NICE HTA report. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, updating the estimates regarding the comparative effectiveness of the aforementioned bisphosphonates. Studies identified from published and unpublished sources between 2014 and 2021 were added to the studies identified in the previous review. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently undertaken by two reviewers. Outcomes were fractures, femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), mortality, and adverse events. We identified 25 additional trials, resulting in a total population of 47,007 participants. All treatments had beneficial effects on fractures versus placebo with zoledronate being the most effective treatment in preventing vertebral fractures HR = 0.38 (95%CrI: 0.28, 0.49). Zoledronate HR = 0.71 (95%CrI: 0.61, 0.81) and risedronate HR = 0.70 (95%CrI: 0.53, 0.84) were found to be the most effective treatments in preventing non-vertebral fractures. All treatments were associated with increases in femoral neck BMD versus placebo with zoledronate being the most effective treatment MD = 4.02 (95%CrI: 3.2, 4.84). There was a paucity of data regarding hip and wrist fractures. Depending on its cost-effectiveness, zoledronate could be considered a first-line option for people at increased risk of fragility fractures.

Citation

Bastounis, A., Langley, T., Davis, S., Paskins, Z., Gittoes, N., Leonardi‐Bee, J., & Sahota, O. (2022). Assessing the Effectiveness of Bisphosphonates for the Prevention of Fragility Fractures: An Updated Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analyses. JBMR Plus, 6(5), S270 - S270. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10620

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Feb 25, 2022
Online Publication Date Mar 7, 2022
Publication Date 2022-05
Publicly Available Date May 30, 2023
Journal JBMR Plus
Print ISSN 2473-4039
Publisher American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 6
Issue 5
Article Number e10620
Pages S270 - S270
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10620
Keywords Antiresorptives; Bisphosphonates; Fracture Prevention; Fractures; Injury; Fracture Healing; Network Meta-analysis; Osteoporosis; Screening; Systematic Review
Publisher URL https://asbmr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm4.10620

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations