Systematic review finds "spin"practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models

Navarro, Constanza L. Andaur; Damen, Johanna A. A.; Takada, Toshihiko; Nijman, Steven W. J.; Dhiman, Paula; Ma, Jie; Collins, Gary S; Bajpai, Ram; Riley, Richard D.; Moons, Karel G. M.; Hooft, Lotty

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the presence and frequency of spin practices and poor reporting standards in studies that developed and/or validated clinical prediction models using supervised machine learning techniques.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We systematically searched PubMed from 01-2018 to 12-2019 to identify diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies using supervised machine learning. No restrictions were placed on data source, outcome, or clinical specialty.

RESULTS: We included 152 studies: 38% reported diagnostic models and 62% prognostic models. When reported, discrimination was described without precision estimates in 53/71 abstracts (74.6%, [95% CI 63.4 - 83.3]) and 53/81 main texts (65.4%, [95% CI 54.6 - 74.9]). Of the 21 abstracts that recommended the model to be used in daily practice, 20 (95.2% [95% CI 77.3 - 99.8]) lacked any external validation of the developed models. Likewise, 74/133 (55.6% [95% CI 47.2 - 63.8]) studies made recommendations for clinical use in their main text without any external validation. Reporting guidelines were cited in 13/152 (8.6% [95% CI 5.1 - 14.1]) studies.

CONCLUSION: Spin practices and poor reporting standards are also present in studies on prediction models using machine learning techniques. A tailored framework for the identification of spin will enhance the sound reporting of prediction model studies.

Citation

Navarro, C. L. A., Damen, J. A. A., Takada, T., Nijman, S. W. J., Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Collins, G. S., Bajpai, R., Riley, R. D., Moons, K. G. M., & Hooft, L. (2023). Systematic review finds "spin"practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 158, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.024

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Mar 28, 2023
• Online Publication Date: Apr 5, 2023
• Publication Date: 2023-06
• Journal: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
• Print ISSN: 0895-4356
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 158
• Pages: 99-110
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.024
• Keywords: Diagnosis; Prognosis; Development; Validation; Misinterpretation; Overinterpretation; Overextrapolation; Spin
• Public URL: https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/426120
• Publisher URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.024