Alice-Maria Toader
Using healthcare systems data for outcomes in clinical trials: issues to consider at the design stage
Toader, Alice-Maria; Campbell, Marion K.; Quint, Jennifer K.; Robling, Michael; ydes, Matthew R.; Thorn, Joanna; Wright-Hughes, Alexandra; Yu, Ly-Mee; Abbott, Tom E. F.; Bond, Simon; Caskey, Fergus J.; Clout, Madeleine; Collinson, Michelle; Copsey, Bethan; Davies, Gwyneth; Driscoll, Timothy; Gamble, Carrol; Griffin, Xavier L.; Hamborg, Thomas; Harris, Jessica; Harrison, David A.; Harji, Deena; Henderson, Emily J.; Logan, Pip; Love, Sharon B.; Magee, Laura A.; O’Brien, Alastair; Pufulete, Maria; Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan; Saratzis, Athanasios; Smith, Jo; Solis-Trapala, Ivonne; Stubbs, Clive; Farrin, Amanda; Williamson, Paula
Authors
Marion K. Campbell
Jennifer K. Quint
Michael Robling
Matthew R. ydes
Joanna Thorn
Alexandra Wright-Hughes
Ly-Mee Yu
Tom E. F. Abbott
Simon Bond
Fergus J. Caskey
Madeleine Clout
Michelle Collinson
Bethan Copsey
Gwyneth Davies
Timothy Driscoll
Carrol Gamble
Xavier L. Griffin
Thomas Hamborg
Jessica Harris
David A. Harrison
Deena Harji
Emily J. Henderson
Pip Logan
Sharon B. Love
Laura A. Magee
Alastair O’Brien
Maria Pufulete
Padmanabhan Ramnarayan
Athanasios Saratzis
Jo Smith
Ivonne Solis-Trapala i.solis-trapala@keele.ac.uk
Clive Stubbs
Amanda Farrin
Paula Williamson
Abstract
Background
Healthcare system data (HSD) are increasingly used in clinical trials, augmenting or replacing traditional methods of collecting outcome data. This study, PRIMORANT, set out to identify, in the UK context, issues to be considered before the decision to use HSD for outcome data in a clinical trial is finalised, a methodological question prioritised by the clinical trials community.
Methods
The PRIMORANT study had three phases. First, an initial workshop was held to scope the issues faced by trialists when considering whether to use HSDs for trial outcomes. Second, a consultation exercise was undertaken with clinical trials unit (CTU) staff, trialists, methodologists, clinicians, funding panels and data providers. Third, a final discussion workshop was held, at which the results of the consultation were fed back, case studies presented, and issues considered in small breakout groups.
Results
Key topics included in the consultation process were the validity of outcome data, timeliness of data capture, internal pilots, data-sharing, practical issues, and decision-making. A majority of consultation respondents (n = 78, 95%) considered the development of guidance for trialists to be feasible. Guidance was developed following the discussion workshop, for the five broad areas of terminology, feasibility, internal pilots, onward data sharing, and data archiving.
Conclusions
We provide guidance to inform decisions about whether or not to use HSDs for outcomes, and if so, to assist trialists in working with registries and other HSD providers to improve the design and delivery of trials.
Citation
Toader, A.-M., Campbell, M. K., Quint, J. K., Robling, M., ydes, M. R., Thorn, J., …Williamson, P. (2024). Using healthcare systems data for outcomes in clinical trials: issues to consider at the design stage. Trials, 25(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-07926-z
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 12, 2024 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 29, 2024 |
Publication Date | Jan 29, 2024 |
Deposit Date | Feb 5, 2024 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 5, 2024 |
Journal | Trials |
Publisher | Springer Verlag |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 25 |
Issue | 1 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-07926-z |
Keywords | Healthcare systems data, Outcomes, Data validity, Registries, Routinely collected data, Clinical trials |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/721704 |
Publisher URL | https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-024-07926-z |
Files
Using healthcare systems data for outcomes in clinical trials: issues to consider at the design stage
(1.2 Mb)
Archive
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Copyright Statement
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search