Richard Holland
Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of pharmacist independent prescribers in care homes: cluster randomised controlled trial
Holland, Richard; Bond, Christine; Alldred, David P; Arthur, Antony; Barton, Garry; Birt, Linda; Blacklock, Jeanette; Blyth, Annie; Cheilari, Stamatina; Daffu-O'Reilly, Amrit; Dalgarno, Lindsay; Desborough, James; Ford, Joanna; Grant, Kelly; Harry, Bronwen; Hill, Helen; Hughes, Carmel; Inch, Jacqueline; Maskrey, Vivienne; Myint, Phyo; Norris, Nigel; Poland, Fiona; Shepstone, Lee; Spargo, Maureen; Turner, David; Watts, Laura; Zermansky, Arnold; Wright, David
Authors
Christine Bond
David P Alldred
Antony Arthur
Garry Barton
Linda Birt
Jeanette Blacklock
Annie Blyth
Stamatina Cheilari
Amrit Daffu-O'Reilly a.k.daffu-o'reilly@keele.ac.uk
Lindsay Dalgarno
James Desborough
Joanna Ford
Kelly Grant
Bronwen Harry
Helen Hill
Carmel Hughes
Jacqueline Inch
Vivienne Maskrey
Phyo Myint
Nigel Norris
Fiona Poland
Lee Shepstone
Maureen Spargo
David Turner
Laura Watts
Arnold Zermansky
David Wright
Abstract
Objective To estimate the effectiveness, cost effectiveness (to be reported elsewhere), and safety of pharmacy independent prescribers in care homes.
Design Cluster randomised controlled trial, with clusters based on triads of a pharmacist independent prescriber, a general practice, and one to three associated care homes.
Setting Care homes across England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, their associated general practices, and pharmacy independent prescribers, formed into triads.
Participants 49 triads and 882 residents were randomised. Participants were care home residents, aged ≥65 years, taking at least one prescribed drug, recruited to 20 residents/triad.
Intervention Each pharmacy independent prescriber provided pharmaceutical care to approximately 20 residents across one to three care homes, with weekly visits over six months. Pharmacy independent prescribers developed a pharmaceutical care plan for each resident, did medicines reviews/reconciliation, trained staff, and supported with medicines related procedures, deprescribing, and authorisation of prescriptions. Participants in the control group received usual care.
Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was fall rate/person at six months analysed by intention to treat, adjusted for prognostic variables. Secondary outcomes included quality of life (EQ-5D by proxy), Barthel score, Drug Burden Index, hospital admissions, and mortality. Assuming a 21% reduction in falls, 880 residents were needed, allowing for 20% attrition.
Results The average age of participants at study entry was 85 years; 70% were female. 697 falls (1.55 per resident) were recorded in the intervention group and 538 falls (1.26 per resident) in the control group at six months. The fall rate risk ratio for the intervention group compared with the control group was not significant (0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.26) after adjustment for all model covariates. Secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups, with exception of the Drug Burden Index, which significantly favoured the intervention. A third (185/566; 32.7%) of pharmacy independent prescriber interventions involved medicines associated with falls. No adverse events or safety concerns were identified.
Conclusions Change in the primary outcome of falls was not significant. Limiting follow-up to six months combined with a small proportion of interventions predicted to affect falls may explain this. A significant reduction in the Drug Burden Index was realised and would be predicted to yield future clinical benefits for patients. This large trial of an intensive weekly pharmacist intervention with care home residents was also found to be safe and well received.
Trial registration ISRCTN 17847169.
Citation
Holland, R., Bond, C., Alldred, D. P., Arthur, A., Barton, G., Birt, L., …Wright, D. (in press). Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of pharmacist independent prescribers in care homes: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ, Article e071883. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071883
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 12, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 14, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Dec 11, 2024 |
Journal | BMJ |
Print ISSN | 0959-8138 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Article Number | e071883 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071883 |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/1014361 |
Publisher URL | https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-071883.full |
You might also like
Quality in care homes: How wearable devices and social network analysis might help
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search