V Jenkins
Patients' and oncologists' views on the treatment and care of advanced ovarian cancer in the U.K.: results from the ADVOCATE study
Jenkins, V; Catt, S; Banerjee, S; Gourley, C; Montes, A; Solis-Trapala, I; Monson, K; Fallowfield, L
Authors
S Catt
S Banerjee
C Gourley
A Montes
Ivonne Solis-Trapala i.solis-trapala@keele.ac.uk
K Monson
L Fallowfield
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most patients presenting with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) eventually relapse. Symptom palliation, maintenance of quality of life (QoL) and prolongation of life are primary therapeutic goals. METHODS: Sixty-six U.K. oncologists completed an online survey about AOC management. Two hundred and two patients were interviewed about care, treatment experiences and expectations. RESULTS: Prior to diagnosis, 34% (69 out of 202) of women had > or =3 symptoms associated with AOC. Twenty-one per cent (43 out of 202) thought poor symptom recognition by general practitioners (GPs) delayed diagnosis. Amelioration of side effects experienced was variable, for example, only 54% (68 out of 127) distressed by alopecia had received sufficient information about it. Clinicians were asked 'What minimum gain in progression-free survival (PFS) would make you feel it worthwhile to offer maintenance therapy?'; 48% (24 out of 50) indicated 5-6 months, but 52% (26 out of 50) believed patients would find PFS of 3-4 months acceptable. When patients were presented with hypothetical scenarios, 33% (52 out of 160) would require 1-2 months extra life, 6% (10 out of 160) 3-4 months, 31% (49 out of 160) 5-6 months, and 31% (49 out of 160) > or =7 months. However, 86% (173 out of 202) would accept treatment that improved QoL without prolongation of life. When asked what was most important, 33% (67 out of 201) said QoL, 9% (19 out of 201) length of life and 57% (115 out of 201) said both were equally important. CONCLUSION: Clinicians' and patients' experiences, expectations and priorities about OC management may differ.
Citation
Jenkins, V., Catt, S., Banerjee, S., Gourley, C., Montes, A., Solis-Trapala, I., …Fallowfield, L. (2013). Patients' and oncologists' views on the treatment and care of advanced ovarian cancer in the U.K.: results from the ADVOCATE study. British journal of cancer, 2264 - 2271. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.223
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 17, 2013 |
Publication Date | Jun 11, 2013 |
Journal | British Journal of Cancer |
Print ISSN | 1532-1827 |
Publisher | Cancer Research UK |
Pages | 2264 - 2271 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.223 |
Keywords | advanced ovarian cancer, chemotherapy treatments, supportive care, patients’ views, oncologists’ views, maintenance therapy |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.223 |
PMID | 23652312 |
Files
Patients' and oncologists' views on the treatment and care of advanced ovarian cancer in the U.K.: results from the ADVOCATE study.pdf
(377 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search