Testing a Model of Consultation-based Reassurance and Back Pain Outcomes with Psychological Risk as Moderator: A Prospective Cohort Study

Hill, Jonathan

Abstract

Objectives:Reassurance is an essential part of treatment for low back pain (LBP), but evidence on effective methods to deliver reassurance remains scarce. The interaction between consultation-based reassurance and patients' psychological risk is unknown. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between consultation-based reassurance and clinical outcomes at follow-up, in people with and without psychological risk.Methods:We tested the associations between specific reassurance components (data gathering, relationship building, generic reassurance, and cognitive reassurance), patients' psychological risk (the presence of depression, anxiety, catastrophizing, or fear-avoidance), and postconsultation outcomes including, satisfaction and enablement, disability, pain, and mood at 3-month follow-up.Results:Adjusted linear regression models using data from patients who had recently consulted for LBP in primary care (n=142 in 43 practices) indicated that all reassurance components were strongly associated with increased satisfaction, whereas generic reassurance was significantly associated with postconsultation enablement. Generic reassurance was also associated with lower pain at 3 months, whereas cognitive reassurance was associated with increased pain. A significant interaction was observed between generic reassurance and psychological risk for depression at 3 months: high rates of generic reassurance were associated with lower depression in low-risk patients, but with higher rates of depression for high-risk groups.Discussion:The findings support the hypothesis that different components of reassurance are associated with specific outcomes, and that psychological risk moderates this relationship for depression. Clinicians reassuring behaviors might therefore have the potential to improve outcomes in people with LBP, especially for patients with higher psychological risk profiles.

Citation

Hill, J. (2018). Testing a Model of Consultation-based Reassurance and Back Pain Outcomes with Psychological Risk as Moderator: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clinical Journal of Pain, 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000541

• Acceptance Date: Sep 28, 2017
• Publication Date: Apr 1, 2018
• Journal: Clinical Journal of Pain
• Print ISSN: 0749-8047
• Publisher: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
• Pages: 339-348
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000541
• Keywords: back pain, reassurance, psychological risk, prospective
• Publisher URL: http://journals.lww.com/clinicalpain/Abstract/publishahead/Testing_a_Model_of_Consultation_based_Reassurance.98984.aspx