Ian Scott i.scott@keele.ac.uk
Validation of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) in Primary Care Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain
Scott, Ian C.; McCray, Gareth; Lancaster, Gillian; Foster, Nadine E.; Hill, Jonathan C.
Authors
Gareth McCray g.mccray@keele.ac.uk
Gillian Lancaster
Nadine E. Foster
Professor Jonathan Hill j.hill@keele.ac.uk
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the responsiveness, and concurrent validity of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) in UK primary care patients with common musculoskeletal (MSK) pain presentations.
Methods
A secondary analysis of a primary care pilot randomised trial (STarT MSK) was performed. In 524 people consulting with back, neck, shoulder, knee, or multi-site pain, the following were recorded at 0/6 months: MSK-HQ, EQ-5D-5L, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ; back pain), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Knee Injury and Outcome Score (KOOS), Short-Form-12 (SF-12; multisite pain). At 6-months, patients self-rated their global change in MSK condition, from -5 (“very much worse”) to +5 (“completely recovered”). Receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated abilities of 6-month changes in each patient reported outcome measure (PROM) to discriminate between patients improving/not improving on global change scores, with Minimal Clinically Important Differences (MCID) calculated.
Results
The MSK-HQ had a good ability to discriminate between MSK pain patients reporting global improvement vs. no improvement (area under the curve [AUC] 0.81; 95% CI 0.78, 0.85). Its discriminative ability was higher than the EQ-5D-5L (AUC 0.68; 95% CI 0.62, 0.73) and similar to site-specific PROMs. The MCID for the 6-month change in MSK-HQ was 5.5. The MSK-HQ had strong correlations with all PROMs, except SF-12 scores.
Conclusion
In primary care patients with common MSK pain presentations, the MSK-HQ was as good as existing pain-site specific PROMs at identifying people reporting global improvements in their MSK condition, and was better than the EQ-5D-5L.
Citation
Scott, I. C., McCray, G., Lancaster, G., Foster, N. E., & Hill, J. C. (2020). Validation of the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) in Primary Care Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 50(5), 813-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.06.022
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 25, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 13, 2020 |
Publication Date | 2020-10 |
Journal | Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism |
Print ISSN | 0049-0172 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 50 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 813-820 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.06.022 |
Keywords | Musculoskeletal, patient reported outcome measures, primary care, quality of life |
Public URL | https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/417164 |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.06.022 |
Files
MSK-HQ Primary Care Seminars AR Revised_Untracked.docx
(131 Kb)
Document
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
Investigating the construct measured by banked gap-fill items: Evidence from eye-tracking
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search