Prof Janet Lefroy j.e.lefroy@keele.ac.uk
Can learning from workplace feedback be enhanced by reflective writing? A realist evaluation in UK undergraduate medical education
Lefroy, Janet; Molyneux, Adrian
Authors
Adrian Molyneux
Abstract
Introduction Doctors and medical students in the UK are currently required to provide evidence of learning by reflective writing on (among other things) feedback from colleagues. Although the theoretical value of reflecting-on-action is clear, research is still needed to know how to realise the potential of written reflection in medical education. This study arose out of efforts to improve medical student engagement with a reflective writing exercise. We used realist methodology to explain the disinclination of the majority to do written reflection on workplace feedback, and the benefits to the minority. Method Realist evaluation is a suitable approach to researching complex interventions which have worked for some and not for others. Focus groups were held over a three-year period with year 3 and 4 students. Focus group transcripts were coded for context-mechanism-outcome configurations (the realist approach to analysing data) explaining students’ choice not to write a reflection, to write a ‘tick-box’ reflection or to write for learning. A sub-set of eight students’ reflections were also analysed to ascertain evidence of learning through reflection. Results and Discussion 27 students participated in 4 focus groups. Three summary theories emerged showing the importance of context. Firstly, written reflection is effortful and benefits those who invest in it for intrinsic reasons in situations when they need to think more deeply about a learning event. Secondly, following a reflective feedback discussion writing a reflection may add little because the learning has already taken place. Thirdly, external motivation tends to result in writing a ‘tick-box’ reflection.
Citation
Lefroy, J., & Molyneux, A. (2021). Can learning from workplace feedback be enhanced by reflective writing? A realist evaluation in UK undergraduate medical education. Education for Primary Care, https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2021.1920472
Acceptance Date | Apr 19, 2021 |
---|---|
Publication Date | May 14, 2021 |
Journal | Education for Primary Care |
Print ISSN | 1473-9879 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2021.1920472 |
Keywords | Reflective practice; written reflection; workplace assessment; learning from feedback; undergraduate medical education |
Publisher URL | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14739879.2021.1920472 |
Files
Can learning from workplace feedback be enhanced by reflective writing A realist evaluation in UK undergraduate medical education.pdf
(1.4 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
written reflection paper for EPC accepted.pdf
(496 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
You might also like
Utility of an app-based system to improve feedback following workplace-based assessment.
(2017)
Journal Article
How well do UK assistantships equip medical students for graduate practice? Think EPAs.
(2023)
Journal Article
Feasibility study of student telehealth interviews
(2022)
Journal Article
Using realist evaluation to explain preparedness for doctors’ memorable 'firsts'
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search