Zoe Paskins z.paskins@keele.ac.uk
Addressing conflicts of interest: evidence review and recommendations
Paskins
Authors
Abstract
Background More stringent policies for addressing conflicts of interest have been implemented around the world in recent years. Considering the value of revisiting conflict of interest quality standards set by the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration, we sought to review evidence relevant to two questions: (i) What are the effects of different strategies for managing conflicts of interest? and (ii) What are patients’ perspectives on conflicts of interest?
Methods We conducted a narrative review of English language articles and abstracts from 2010 to 2019 that reported relevant quantitative or qualitative research.
Results Of 1,743 articles and 118 abstracts identified, 41 articles and 2 abstracts were included. Most evidence on the effects of conflict of interest management strategies pertained only to subsequent compliance with the management strategy. This evidence highlighted substantial non-compliance with prevailing requirements. Evidence on patient perspectives on conflicts of interest offered several insights, including the existence of diverse views on the acceptability of conflicts of interest, the salience of conflict of interest type and monetary value to patients, and the possibility that conflict of interest disclosure could have unintended effects. We identified no published research on the effects of IPDAS Collaboration conflict of interest quality standards on patient decision-making or outcomes.
Limitations Because we did not conduct a systematic review, we may have missed some evidence relevant to our review questions. Additionally, our team did not include patient partners.
Conclusions The findings of this review have implications for the management of conflicts of interest not only in patient decision aid development but also in clinical practice guideline development, health and medical research reporting, and health care delivery.
Citation
Paskins. (2021). Addressing conflicts of interest: evidence review and recommendations. Medical Decision Making, https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211008881
Acceptance Date | Mar 12, 2021 |
---|---|
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2021 |
Journal | Medical Decision Making |
Print ISSN | 0272-989X |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211008881 |
Keywords | clinical practice guidelines; competing interests; conflict of interest; patient decision aids; patient perspectives |
Publisher URL | https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0272989X211008881 |
Files
Manuscript_Clean (1).docx
(229 Kb)
Document
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
You might also like
Assessing collaborative efforts of making care fit for each patient: A systematic review
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Keele Repository
Administrator e-mail: research.openaccess@keele.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search